Production Downtime
Many manufacturers stop production deliberately when they detect an intrusion, because they cannot be sure the plant is safe. The financial impact of a halted line often dwarfs the ransom itself.
Factories, plants and vehicle makers now depend on connected systems that were never designed with attackers in mind. When ransomware reaches production, every hour of downtime is felt across the supply chain.
Manufacturers have connected machines, sensors and production planning to corporate networks and suppliers to work faster and smarter. The same connections give attackers a path from a phishing email to the plant floor, as recent incidents in the automotive sector have shown.
We help manufacturers secure the link between IT and operational technology, test plant systems without disrupting production, protect designs and know how, and plan recovery so lines can restart quickly.
Many manufacturers stop production deliberately when they detect an intrusion, because they cannot be sure the plant is safe. The financial impact of a halted line often dwarfs the ransom itself.
Criminal groups target manufacturers because downtime creates intense pressure to pay. They often enter through remote access, unpatched edge devices or a supplier connection.
Industrial controllers, robots and sensors often run old software and cannot be patched quickly. Weak segmentation lets an IT compromise spread straight into operational systems.
Just in time production depends on suppliers, logistics partners and software providers. An attack on any of them can stop your lines even if your own systems are untouched.
Designs, formulations and process know how are prized by competitors and state backed groups. Theft can go unnoticed for months if no one is watching for it.
The obligations that shape security in manufacturing & automotive, and how we help you meet them with evidence rather than paperwork.
Vehicle makers selling into the EU must run a certified cyber security management system and a managed software update process for new vehicles. ISO/SAE 21434 is the engineering standard widely used to show how cyber risk is handled across the vehicle lifecycle.
Official guidanceThe international series of standards for securing industrial automation and control systems, covering zones and conduits, secure product development and the responsibilities of operators and suppliers.
Official guidanceManufacturers of connected products sold in the EU must report actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents from 11 September 2026, with full security requirements following in December 2027.
Official guidanceBrings many manufacturers of critical products, including vehicles, machinery and electronics, into scope as important entities in the EU, with risk management and incident reporting duties.
Official guidanceHow a typical attack on manufacturing & automotive unfolds, step by step. Press play to watch it run.
Attackers use stolen credentials on an unpatched remote access appliance used by a maintenance contractor.
They move through the corporate network and find a flat connection to the engineering workstations that program the production line.
They disable backups and stage ransomware to launch over a weekend, when fewer people are watching.
Managed detection spots the unusual remote session and lateral movement, analysts isolate the affected hosts, and IT and OT segmentation keeps the plant out of reach.
Testing the IT and OT boundary in advance, monitoring around the clock and rehearsing recovery turn a potential shutdown into a contained IT incident.
Illustrative example, not a real incident.

Ransomware in manufacturing is rising because downtime is so costly. Learn why plants are targeted, how the ransomware lifecycle works and how to cut risk.
Read article · 10 min
The JLR cyber attack halted production and hit its supply chain hard. Learn what happened, why automotive cyber security matters and lessons for suppliers.
Read article · 4 min
Smart factory cyber security: the hidden threats in industrial IoT and how to secure devices, protect operational technology and reduce risk with maintenance.
Read article · 4 minYes. OT testing is planned with your engineers, uses passive and carefully controlled techniques and avoids live safety systems, so production carries on.
Downtime is so expensive that manufacturers feel strong pressure to pay ransoms, and connected plants often contain older systems that are hard to patch.
IT security protects data and business systems, while OT security protects the physical processes they control. In OT, safety and availability come first, so testing and patching need a different approach.
If you make or import products with digital elements sold in the EU, it is likely to. Reporting duties apply from September 2026, with full requirements from December 2027.
Tell us about your organisation, the regulations you work under and what is worrying you most.
A member of our team will be in touch to talk through your sector and requirements.