Threat-led scenario design
Define plausible adversary objectives using your business context, exposed services and relevant threats. Focus on meaningful attack paths rather than testing activity for its own sake.
Ask about thisUnderstand how an adversary could move towards an agreed business objective, and how effectively your team would detect and respond. Cybergen connects controlled attack simulation with practical defensive improvement.
Illustrative example only, not live data
Security tools and procedures need to work together when an attacker moves across identities, systems and services. Testing isolated weaknesses can leave questions about the wider attack path and the response it would trigger.
Red teaming evaluates that path through an objective-led exercise. Purple teaming brings offensive and defensive teams together to test techniques, examine telemetry and improve controls collaboratively. We help you choose the approach that answers the questions your organisation needs to resolve.
Talk to our teamSix connected areas, scoped to your organisation and delivered by people who understand the business context behind the controls.
Define plausible adversary objectives using your business context, exposed services and relevant threats. Focus on meaningful attack paths rather than testing activity for its own sake.
Ask about thisConduct agreed activity towards a defined outcome, such as access to a representative sensitive resource. Assess the barriers, detections and response decisions encountered along the way.
Ask about thisWork openly with defenders to run selected techniques, examine results and make improvements. Use repeatable tests to understand whether changes have improved detection or prevention.
Ask about thisReview which events were generated, which alerts were raised and what investigators could establish. Identify gaps between available telemetry and the information responders need.
Ask about thisTranslate observed weaknesses into changes to configuration, monitoring, identity safeguards and response procedures. Prioritise improvements around the attack paths demonstrated.
Ask about thisRepeat agreed scenarios after remediation and explain the techniques to your teams. Capture what worked and where further validation is needed.
Ask about thisSet objectives, authorisation, boundaries, escalation contacts and stop conditions.
Select scenarios and define how testing will avoid unacceptable operational impact.
Run the agreed approach and collect the evidence needed to assess results.
Debrief, prioritise improvements and validate selected changes.
Penetration testing typically assesses exploitable weaknesses within a defined technical scope. Red teaming is driven by an adversary objective and examines the wider path, including detection and response. Both have value.
Purple teaming can suit teams that want to validate and improve specific detections collaboratively. Red teaming can help evaluate broader resilience when foundational controls and response processes are ready for that test.
Only when explicitly authorised and included in the rules of engagement. Third-party systems, sensitive techniques and potentially disruptive actions require clearly defined boundaries.
Choose an exercise that answers a clear question about your exposure, detections or response, and leaves your teams with practical improvements.
A member of our team will be in touch shortly.